Canton, Massachusetts · Saved source text
PB-July-20-05
Saved text from 4 of 4 source pages. Transcription and OCR may contain errors; verify figures and wording against the original.
Source page 1
PLANNING BOARD MEETING WEDNESDAY, JULY 20, 2005 7:00 P.M. TOWN HALL MEETING ROOM 801 WASHINGTON ST. MINUTES Members present: Peter PJneo, Chairman, ,leremy Comeau, Vice Chairman, Dean Miller, and Jill Hayes. George Jenkins absent. Secretary, Suzanne FeJgen. Meeting came to order at 7:00P.M. CTTTZENS SPEAK No one wished to speak TOWN PLANNER, ROGER NICHOLAS, UPDATE Housing Plan: Roger prepared the Housing Plan for submission to the State with the correction of Clerk being George Jenkins. Plymouth Rubber District: Roger will meet tomorrow with Peter. He feels that there will be some back and forth review between the Board and the way they want it. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mrs. Hayes, the Board voted to send the Housing Plan to the State. Voted 4-0 in favor. Wall Street: Roger will look into the :[0% affordable housing number there. Roger handed out a CCEOD map and completed projects to the Board. 1. OVERLOOK ROAD EXTENSTON SUBDTVTSTON UPDATE Mr. Tom Houston spoke on the change in the storm drainage system installed by the developer. The applicant installed a revised system within the layout at his own risk. He is hoping to install a modified drainage pipe which would complete that drainage system revision. Other than that, he has responded to occasions from calls to the Planning Board's office about questions of the conditions of approval to this subdivision were being complied to by the
Source page 2
developer. Specifically, he spoke about the ledge removal, the installation of most utilities, and the storm drain system. The hours of operation, and trucks running uncovered were reported. In regard to drainage, the Planning Board acts before the ConCom finishes with the applicant. The system approved by the Planning Board was larger concrete tanks with outlet controls. ConCom preferred not to have these, but to have conventional structures and install large outflow pipes. _Jim Burke, the engineer for the applicant, Michael Bucchieri stated that he has plans and a letter requesting that the ConCom issue an amended Order of Conditions. They filed today. They feel if they have to, they can go back and install drainage the original way. The Board feels they should allow ConCom to act finally on the drainage before they weigh in on the modified plan. Mr. Rizzo has to agree to that drain line. Dust control- Mr. Pineo suggested that mulch be placed on the dry soil in front of the neighbor's houses. He agreed to have that in place by Monday of next week. Hoe ramming is not completed. Tt is needed for water services up to the curb stop. The depth is about 4'. This means they will be again within 120' of the neighbors. Mr. Comeau pointed out that he noticed six conditions that have been violated. The six issues were discussed with Mr. Bucchieri. They included start up time too early, observed no metal plates covering open holes at the end of the day, equipment being secured on the site, fire hydrant not being blocked at any time, no closing of the street, without 24 hours prior notice to all officials, and dust control. Since Mr. _]enkins has experience in ledge removal at the High School site, Mr. Burke was advised to seek his advise on the method of ledge removal preferred in the basin. He agreed to speak with him and report to the Board of his findings. Mr. Miller asked about use of the other methods of ledge removal other than hoe ramming, he explained that the reason for preferring the use of hoe ramming was it is faster, also for depth. Attorney Fox representing the Rizzo family on 5 Overlook Road, spoke to the Board on the change of the size of the water pipe. He presented photos of the house foundation and trenches in question. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board voted to allow hoe ramming with the condition that the use of expandable grout at the High School site, be investigated through the expertise of Board member Mr. ,lenkins. Mr. Burke will put together information on hoe ramming from his experience. Also that 48 hours notice be given to the Board and to Mr. Houston prior
Source page 3
to any ledge removal. Voted 4-0 in favor. Any more infractions, Hrs. Hayes moves to have a hearing to rescind the subdivision. 2. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD APPLICANTS Continued to August 3rd. 3. 943 WASHINGTON ST. SUBDIVISION: PATRICK CONSIDINE/CEC ENGINEERING/RICHARD STAITI, ESQ. Richard Staiti, Esq. spoke for his client on the conclusion of this subdivision process. A list of items were submitted to the Board. Tncluded were a storm management plan, a construction plan, and he did talk to the Chief of Police concerning signage. The homeowners association agreement was not ready but will have it ready soon. Under the draft, under item 5, he discussed the language of preservation that the Board had discussed previously. Other than naming this road, he believes he had complied with all requests. The Board wished to discuss the street trees. The restrictive covenant will go with the lots. The lot with ledge, will restrict the owner of the lot from removing the ledge. IVlr. Staiti mentioned consulting with the Veteran agent on street name. IVlr. Considine objected to the fact that that in this subdivision, applying first for a Scenic Way waiver was part of the conditions of approval. IVlr. Considine felt that he could not apply for a Scenic Way waiver since he did not know the name of the contractor in order to put that name on the application. The Chairman asked how close the stone wall, if any, was in relation to the street. The issue of the Scenic Road by-law was discussed. IVlr. Considine pointed out that the only item received tonight was the homeowner's policy. The approval will be continued to the next meeting of 8/3/05 as the first item. Ttems required: 1. name of street 2. street trees picked (shade trees)not sugar maple or Norway maple (DEP operation manual) be on the plan 3. copies of homeowners agreement 4. set of site plans 5. scenic way filing 4. SITEPLAN-5 SPRINGDALE AVE.-DON MCNIECE/SUZANNE
Source page 4
MATTHEWS, ESQ. Don McNiece was present with his attorney Suzanne Matthews. Mr. Miller asked how old the house to be demolished was. The house was built in 1941. They already have the demolition permit issued by the Building Department. The house will be razed, and a new commercial building will be built. It is a 4500 s.f. building with two parking areas. There will be two recharging locations on the site. Need details on the shrubs on the landscaping plan. John Rhoads, of Norwood Engineering will be ready by the next meeting of August 3, 2005. Other Business: George Hardiman-Re: Plymouth Rubber By-]aw Workshop: Update was given by Mrs. Hayes concerning the survey. She has tallied 50 responses from the survey distributed around Town and the discussion should continue to early August. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mrs. Hayes, the Board voted to seek three phone quotes for lNashin~ton Commons, and United Rental for engineering review services. The vote was unanimous 4-0 in favor. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mrs. Hayes, the Board voted to prepare an RFP for consulting services, so that at the next meeting, they can go forward and advertise in a publication. The vote was unanimous 4-0 in favor. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mrs. Hayes, the Board voted to create a sub-committee to work on the RFP, namely Mr. Comeau and Mr. Miller. Voted 4-0 in favor. Mr. Comeau will take care of the street change at Royall for Pinnacle. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board voted to approve the minutes of June 15, ~'oo5. Voted 4-o in favor. Upon a motion made by Mr. Comeau and seconded by Mr. Miller, the Board voted to adjourn the meeting at 8:50 P.M. Meeting adjourned by a vote of 4-0 in favor. Clerk